It's a good movie, but not as stirring as I'd hoped it would be, maybe because it tried a little bit too hard, in the end. Like most biopics, I'm glad I saw it, but I probably won't ever see it again.
A lot of people have been saying Milk is the MLK of the gay community. I think Harvey Milk was more like Obama. He was a grassroots community organizer who had a knack for bringing competing teams together for his cause... Who knows where his story might have taken him?
The film was shot beautifully, as Gus Van Sant does well every time. It's bright slightly overexposed 70's photo-look lent perfectly to the sense of that time and place. Everyone is decent in their roles, with the exception of Emile Hirsch....I'll get to him later, but Sean Penn and Josh Brolin are stand-outs. Brolin BETTER get something this year, dammit.
It is a little annoying that no 'out' actors could be found to play any of the major roles in this film... And that's especially ironic given one of Milk's political tactics.
Overrall, I think this is a film that needs to be shown in high schools. If only our culture weren't so afraid of TEHGAYSECKS!! and sex, period, for that matter.
One of the biggest steps in the black community's struggle for equal rights, has been the slow uphill battle of letting the "rest of the country" see us as the diverse people we are and not the spooky boogiemen they imagine.
Sidney Poitier was a definite stop on the road to Obama.
More Ennis del Mar' s and Harvey Milk's need to be seen, hopefully played by a Sir Ian McKellen, next time.PARENTS: Every teen should see it for history and empathy's sake.
P.S. On Prop 8.
It was Prop 6, in the film. Milk did something that was not done this time around. He recruited everybody. He never assumed support. He recruited vets, the elderly, black people, teamsters, whoever it took. He didn't take anyone's support for granted and then use his inaction as a justification for racism. He and his all-white campaign team went. after. EVERYBODY.
Folks have been wondering what kind of impact this film might have had, had it opened before the vote was on the ballots.
I'm hoping people would have at least, taken that lesson away.
P.P.S. Oh! I almost forgot Emile. Ehh, he just doesn't do it for me as an actor. I think he's overrated and just plain awful. Here, he had a spotlight moment that just had me rolling my eyes, thinking a kid in a high school play could do better. He also came off to me like he was "acting" gay and that's annoying.
P.P.P.S. Remember that thing I was saying about "the rest of the country" needing to see diverse people like themselves and not spooky boogiemen?











5 comments:
I agree with mostly everything you said, with the exception of Emile Hirsch. I actually thought he was fine in his role, but the problem was that the supporting characters never really got stand out scenes. The only actor I had a problem with was Diego Luna, who ruined every scene he was in.
@trav
I think Diego was playing an annoying character.
It wasn't my favorite role or performance either, for that matter, but Emile still takes the cake, in my book.
thanks for that final link (in the ppps). that was sweet. as for the movie, i'm waiting 'til it comes out on DVD. Several of my friends who grew up/came out during that era were very moved by the film.
on a completely unrelated note, a friend and I were having a small argument about applauding at the end of a movie. He said it was pointless and stupid (because, y'know, the director isn't there to hear you). And, I said that it was a perfectly acceptable thing to do to show appreciation for a film you enjoyed. Then, I began to wonder what you thought? To applaud or not applaud at the end of movie? That is the question.
*smooches*
@vuboq
You're welcome. I don't feel like I deserve a pat on the back for it, though. It's just basic human empathy we all should have.
And even if you don't agree for religious reasons, I don't understand forcing others to adhere it just so...you feel comfortable?
Religious morality should not be law.
On that clapping argument? Check the comments.
I'm with Sophia.
"Like most biopics, I'm glad I saw it, but I probably won't ever see it again."
I feel the same way about biopics, and it's a major reason I'm biased against them when awards season comes. Expertly made or no, how can we give Best Picture awards to films that we don't want to see again?
Post a Comment
As always, I appreciate all comments whether you agree or disagree.
Just don't be nasty, vague, or disrespectful.
Trolling will get you deleted.
Thanks. :)