February 22, 2009

DCMOVIEGIRL'S OSCARWATCH




Okay, I am HONESTLY not up to live-blogging tonight...So, I'll do some post-commentary tomorrow. Thanks, guys.

Though I will say, Hugh Jackman was a good choice. The awards have a nice old school classy glow about them.

I am loving the format, this year. And I've already been wrong on two predictions.


Before I begin, some predictions:

Kate Winslet - Actress

Mickey Rourke - Actor

Slumdog Millionaire - Picture

Danny Boyle - Director

In Bruges - Original Screenplay

Heath Ledger - Supporting Actor

Amy Adams - Supporting Actress

WALL-e - Animated Film

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button - Art Direction

Slumdog Millionaire - Cinematography

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button - Costume Design

Man on Wire - Documentary

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button - Make-up/Special Effects

Slumdog Millionaire - Score

Slumdog Millionaire "O Saya" - Song

Presto - Animated Short

Slumdog Millionaire - Adapted Screenplay

February 12, 2009

D.C. MOVIEGIRL'S 5 STEPS TO MAKING A GOOD MOVIE ABOUT RACISM



Okay, I have a rant/confession and it's so very appropriate for Black History Month.

I hate most movies about race.
I really, REALLY, freakin' do.

Now, I'm specifically referring to movies about slavery, the civil rights movement, and the like. Now, the reason for this, is not because of the subject matter, no...Honestly, we don't make near enough movies about race, not even close to enough.

It's easier to shine a light other people's sins, than it is to turn the mirror on our own. ....*cough*holocaust*cough*

No, I tend to despise them, because most movies about race are as cliche, as that shot of a man jumping away from a blowing-up building and somehow managing to escape, shrapnel-free. They also tend to not be as diverse as Holocaust movies; from Roberto Benigni's Life is Beautiful to the endured horrors of The Pianist.

Cliches diminish the truth and impact of these events. Also, I'm just plain sick and tired of seeing the same thing done with the same formula, over and over, AND OVER.

That being said...

WHEN and if Hollywood gets the balls to try to make a decent movie about race (I'm talking Schindler's List level), they need to listen to DCMOVIEGIRL and...


#1 GET RID OF THE WHITE HERO

You know who I'm talking about. There's always gotta be a white person acting as a stand-in tourist for the white audience, so they too, will buy tickets and feel a part of things.

I understand. It soothes white guilt to be able to think that maybe, just maybe their ancestors weren't indifferent, afraid to act, or imposing that level of cruelty.

Oh, please, get over it, like y'all keep telling US to do. :-/

HUMAN BEINGS are cruel. Even today. Read the papers. It has no more to do with you, today than I do with distant celebrity relatives on the family-tree. Just watch the damn movie and don't look all apologetic at me, afterward.

...Unless, that is, you're still afraid to talk about/learn about race in this country, and have ZERO understanding of the role of these things in white privilege. And if you have done zip to prevent racism especially when you witness it, in your day-to-day interactions...but I digress...


Cry Freedom, Mississippi Burning, heck even Rosewood had Jon Voight. It's okay to include good white people, because they did exist. It's okay to include morally ambiguous black people, because they also existed. HOWEVER, I think before we even think of moving the "good" white characters, beyond the periphery, we need to a make an excellent race film that has documentary-style honesty without them, because WE saved ourselves, more than anyone else rescued us. Not honoring that? Is the most egregious kind of insult, of all.

#2 NO MORE HOWLING BLACK WOMEN


Now, this is something I am REALLY tired of. In just about every civil rights movie, that's ever been made, there is a moaning or screaming black woman, clutching her dead son/husband/nephew/whatever's head as she wails at the heavens.

Please.

Stop.

No really.

The other kind of moaning black woman in these movies, is the one on the soundtrack, singing some mournful, church-song; usually at the same time, the other howler is clutching her dead son/husband/nephew/WHATEVER's head in her lap, as she screams up to the heavens.

...OR
during a funeral, usually attended by howling mom, and "good" white hero.

STOP IT. PLEASE. I BEG OF YOU.

#3 NO HEAVY-HANDED SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS

Why? Because it's the difference between TELLING the audience what to think, being all condescending and preachy about it, and SHOWING them. Let them make up their own minds based on the subtleties of a quality piece of film-making.

Please, no, more white people overly-emphasizing the n-word. Why? Because it was as casually said back then, as 'milk and cookies', is said today.

And people forget. ...Black people got so used to this, that no, they DIDN'T dramatically flinch every time the word was tossed out. As casually as some in the hip-hop community use it today? Many black people did back then, because it was so ingrained in them, that that was what they thought they were.

Talk to an older (ESPECIALLY southern) black person, over ninety-five. Look at old documentary footage of black people speaking. You might be shocked at what they refer to themselves and other black people as.

Now, that's some tragedy some of these knucklehead kids these days, NEED to see.

#4 NO MORE OVERACTING


This connects with the self-righteousness. Because there's always some emphatically over-the-top speech refuting horrible racism. Usually, this is from a beaten down black man or woman, who's just grown tired of all the racist treatment.

Yeah, I understand you're tired, but I doubt many people during those slave-times, specifically, actually made speeches so intense (either to an audience or themselves), that they looked like they were trying to bust a vein in their forehead.


In church? Yup. Because I see that, today. But imagine slaves doing this, around mass'r. You honestly think they could regularly get that loud without some form of punishment??

No, they would learn to keep that stuff bottled up, because they had to. No more dramatically quavering voices. No more, looks of "revenge"at mass'r. Because yeah, they would have caught that and gotten their skin flayed Passion of the Christ style, even if mass'r was just imagining things.

As I said, People. Learned. To bottle it up.

So, black actors? Take it down a notch or three.

#5 IF YOU'RE GOING TO SHOW, SHOW IT ALL

Now, here comes the hard part. If you can show a child hiding in shit in Schlinder's List, you can show a white child smiling beneath the charred body of a black man, because yeah, that happened.You can show lynched pregnant black women who have their stomachs and fetuses ripped open.

I'm not making any of this up. Human beings, man. The depth to which we can sink, and somehow think is normal, is low, low, low.

And here's the hard part that THEY NEVER DO. You can show, black men, women and children who learned to feign indifference to it all.

Think about it.

How would you cope with the regular torture and human abuse on as MASSIVE A SCALE as what black people have gone through, in this country?

Heck, look to the footage of interviews with survivors of gang rape, torture, and mutilation in Sudan. They are shells of their former selves. The ability to feel anything, has been pushed back, in order for them to merely survive.

If our ancestors (when I say OUR I mean many of you white folks with black blood too, so DON'T TRIP) wanted to live through slavery, they grew numb to it and that's not even taking into account the fact that most were born into it. If you've read any slave narratives, you can catch the tone of learned tolerance, of tortures you can scarcely imagine.

I've heard an audio reading of a woman laughing at the fact that she was able to fool her master into believing she had been strung up by her hands all night, when she actually managed to a get a little bit, of leverage. ..Okay?

I have yet to see this honestly depicted on the screen. The closest I've seen to unflinchingly depicting that, was Mandingo (once again, ballsy 70's filmmaking) and that movie had a cheesy blaxploitation vibe.

So, there you go. That's my rant. And I'm sticking to it.

EDIT: And Beloved was so very underrated.

February 11, 2009

THE READER



Okay, you're going to have to forgive me for this one, because it is
hella' late. I actually saw the movie about two weeks ago, but I didn't feel like posting. However, I realized I haven't posted anything up in this piece, for a long time.

I can't leave you guys shorted... So, in brief...

Kate Winslet does deserve the Oscar, she will surely get for this. I think Lena Olin should have been nominated too and... Because of the nature of a good chunk of the film, this was my thought process, during said chunk:

SPOILER!!

highlight the inviso-text ->*eww!jailbait!thatwaskindahoteww!kiddieporrrn!*

Anyway, the movie itself was good in an afternoon arthouse kinda' way. That is, filmed well, patiently unfolding story, moral ambiguity. It's a worthy effort.

Nothing earthshattering, mind you, but good. Oh, and uh, Ralph Fiennes bored me.

Do the arthouse, afternoon @ E Street, thing.


PARENTS: If you've highlighted the invisotext, You know what's up. KEEP THE KIDDIES HOME

February 02, 2009

MORE AIRBENDER RACEFAIL




First, in case you missed my other post.

According to Variety, Dev Patel has replaced Jesse McCartney as Zuko in the Avatar: The Last Airbender movie, because of "scheduling conflicts".

Uh, huh.

...And my real name is Dirt McGirt.

From what I've heard from the fans, this actor seems more suited for Sokka, but then that would ruin the whole "tokenish" gesture, wouldn't it?

...Making the sole person of color (and the only one with real acting cred, mind you) a good guy, too?

I love M. Knight's quote on this:

Patel was "already one of the guys I was interested in. Then I saw 'Slumdog Millionaire,' and the kid just grew in my eyes," he said.



So, then why the F^&* didn't you hire him in the FIRST PLACE?!

*sigh* Oh, Hollywood you so predictable with the racefailure.

February 01, 2009

UNDERWORLD: RISE OF THE LYCANS



I wasn't going to bother, but seeing as there's nothing worth seeing in the mainstream theaters right now, that hasn't recently been expanded from arthouses, because of Oscar-nods...

Ehh, why not?

It doesn't hurt that aspects of the film definitely connect with the previous post.

Let me just get this out the way, real quick.

The movie sucks.

It's bad. I mean boring bad, not the fun-bad I had hoped for. The soundtrack is awful, the story is wooden, and nothing makes it worth seeing in the theater. You'd probably even flip past it on cable. The fights are lackluster and badly filmed (you've at least gotta love the helicopter blade scene from Underworld 2).

So, you might ask yourself, what is Frost/Tony Blair doing in this movie?!

My guess? Contractual obligation/new addition to the mansion. ....Same for Davy Jones.

But that's not why I took time to make this post. I'm doing it because this guy...
















...Deserves to be on the a'fore posted list of black sci-fi icons.

That's Kevin Grevioux.

How, could I forget him?!

Yes, he looks like he'd enjoy a nice tender baby roast in the above photo, but this former microbiologist (reason #124,678 why prejudging folks is just stupid) is the creator of a pretty successful sci-fi franchise.

...Mostly stupid, yes, but at least he gave werewolves, excuse me, lycans some much needed love.

Remember that thing I said about why many folks of color dig sci-fi?

You know, the whole really identifying with characters who are outsiders thing? Well, let's just say the subtext in this film is such that if I didn't know it was created by a black dude, I would most definitely have guessed as much.

The hero here basically starts out as the lycan Mandingo and turns into Nat Turner.

...No, REALLY.





PARENTS: There's hanging-off-a-cliff, slo-mo, sex and some video game gore. I think the saavy teeny-boppers this is clearly aimed at, should be fine with this.